Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS OF THE FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER W. WALLACE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS OF THE FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, BARNES, CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
DONTEREGAN L. SANDERS
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEGAN
Defendant:
ROY, CASEY, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUBY v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. RUBY
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, FLOYD COUNTY, HOLBROK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEDRICK v. MCCUTHEN et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. DEDRICK
Defendant:
MCCUTHEN, M. CHALEUNPHONH, STEVE BUSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASON JR v. WARDON
as 1:2023cv00684
Petitioner:
FLOYD M MASON JR
Respondent:
WARDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Baur et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Floyd Leonard Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Baur, Jule, Derick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIDWELL v. C/O LOCK et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. KIDWELL
Defendant:
C/O LOCK, C/O LOVANS, ZELIFITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
