Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Lambert et al v. FRESENIUS MANAGEMENT SE, et al
as 1:2015cv12844
Plaintiff:
Floyd Lambert and Dorothy Lambert
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MANAGEMENT SE, FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE AG & CO. KGaA., FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Padmanabhan
as 15-1638
Petitioner:
BHARANIDHARAN PADMANBHAN
Respondent:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, (Boston Regional Office), RAYMOND HURD, WILLIAM KASSLER and others
Drewry v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 15-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON BOONE DREWRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, ELISABETH LAMSON, Health Services Administrator, ROBERT CLINTON, Regional Medical Director and others
Interested Party:
JANET T. MILLS, Attorney General
Floyd v. USA
as 4:2015cv40053
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Catherine Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Floyd v. Jarvis
as 1:2014cv14419
Petitioner:
David Floyd
Respondent:
Joseph Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Floyd v. Jarvis
as 1:2014cv14109
Petitioner:
David Floyd
Respondent:
Joseph Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Floyd, Sr. et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv13948
Plaintiff:
Dennis Luther Floyd, Sr. and Christopher Floyd
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stote, et al v. Umass Correctional Health Care, et al
as 14-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE
:
JAMES CYR and JOSE SIME
Plaintiff:
WAYNE D. CROSBY, TERRY CARTER, ENEZ KOLENVOVIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UMASS MEDICAL SCHOOL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Hamilton et al v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12750
Plaintiff:
Floyd Hamilton
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
