Cases 31 - 40 of 57
KARCHER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2016cv00232
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Plaintiff:
KARCHER, ERIKA NEUMAN, LINDA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
FLOYD v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2015cv01368
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and GERALD JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
BRITTENY FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COLLINS et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2015cv00566
Plaintiff:
FLOYD J. COLLINS and ADOL T. OWEN-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2015cv00493
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
FLOYD CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
IN RE: OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL MASTERS DECISION IN COBELL V. JEWELL, 96-CV-1285
as 1:2014mc01168
Pecial_master:
RICHARD A. LEVIE
Claimant:
DENISE L. STAUTZ, BRUCE ALLEN BOND, DON RICHARD KALASHIAN and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLOYD v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv00667
Petitioner:
DESHAWN FLOYD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and RAYMOND BYRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ATHENS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
ATHENS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NORTH KANSAS CITY HOSPITAL , CHATTANOOGA HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ADAMS v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2014cv00433
Plaintiff:
DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant:
NELDA MARTINEZ, CARLOS VALDEZ, FLOYD SIMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
