Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Groover-Floyd v. USA
as 1:2024cv00459
Petitioner:
Kendrick Groover-Floyd
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shank v. Hanover Intermodal Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Elmer Shank
Defendant:
Hanover Intermodal Transport, Inc., Hanover Intermodal Transport, Inc. doing business as HIT Logistics and Cory T. Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Olmstead et al v. Nygaard et al
as 4:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Laurie Olmstead and Danny K. Olmstead
Defendant:
Kim S. Nygaard and Floyd Blinsky Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clervrain et al v. Fetterman et al
as 3:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Lormil Woodny and others
Defendant:
John Fetterman, Elena Cross, Will Danowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bogle v. Zaken et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Petitioner:
Floyd C. Bogle
Respondent:
Michael Zaken and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brett v. D'Andrea et al
as 1:2020cv01398
Defendant:
Shortly Blueh, Chrystal Brown, Barry Mighr and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv01668
Defendant:
Lt. Harmon, Michael E. Clark, Paul Ennis and others
Plaintiff:
Shamel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Libby et al
as 3:2018cv02041
Plaintiff:
Charles Floyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Chad Libby, Rick Anglemeyer, Michael Rozman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. County of York et al
as 1:2017cv00904
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jacobs
Defendant:
County of York, Kevin Hoffman, Donald L. Reihart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
