Cases 1 - 10 of 16
PBLX et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2020cv00624
Defendant:
Century Tree Service, Floyd Thomas Smith and Pure Body Logics
Plaintiff:
PBLX and Lodley Mataele
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Floyd et al v. Lamrite West et al
as 1:2020cv00099
Defendant:
Lamrite West, Michaels Stores a Texas Corporation doing business as The Michaels Companies and Darice
Plaintiff:
Stacey D. Floyd and Sticky Sticks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eyre et al v. Lemmel et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Tara Lemmel, Otis Carroll, Jr Floyd T. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod LaMar, Luke B. Eyre, Nathan D. Nearman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Asher v. Quicken Loans
as 2:2017cv01203
Plaintiff:
R. Floyd Asher
Defendant:
Quicken Loans
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rowe v. DPI Specialty Foods et al
as 2:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rowe
Defendant:
DPI Specialty Foods and Jami Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander
Floyd v. Hoover et al
as 2:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
Troy Mathew Floyd
Defendant:
Darin Hoover, Todd Gray, Lucas Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Asher et al v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv00686
Plaintiff:
Melanie Asher and Floyd Asher
Defendant:
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company and Metlife Auto and Home
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Home Design Services v. Ultimate Construction et al
as 2:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Home Design Services
Defendant:
Ultimate Construction and Floyd Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
The American Insurance Company v. Fox Construction et al
as 2:2012cv00031
Plaintiff:
The American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Fox Construction, Floyd Cox and Nellyn Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
