Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. Michael Eliason, et al
as 19-35024
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE HAMILTON, MICHAEL ELIASON and FLOYD AZURE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.
Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. Michael Eliason, et al
as 17-35192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ELIASON, LAWRENCE HAMILTON and FLOYD AZURE, et al.
Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. Michael Eliason, et al
as 16-36005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ELIASON, LAWRENCE HAMILTON and FLOYD AZURE, et al.
Fourstar v. Eliason et al
as 4:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Eliason, Lawrence Hamilton and Floyd Azure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White Eagle-Payne v. Bemer et al
as 4:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Margaret White Eagle-Payne
Defendant:
Howard Bemer, Floyd Azure, Stacie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fort Peck Sisseton and Wahpeto v. Fort Peck Tribal Executive Boa, et al
as 08-35591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FORT PECK SISSETON AND WAHPETON SIOUX EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellee:
FORT PECK TRIBAL EXECUTIVE BOARD, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, TONI GREYBULL and others
Fort Peck Sisseton and Wahpeton Sioux Executive Council et al v. Boyd et al
as 4:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
Fort Peck Sisseton and Wahpeton Sioux Executive Council, Agnes Ward, Myrna First and others
Defendant:
David E. Boyd, Sr., Donna Buckles-Whitmer, Midge Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fort Peck Sisseton and Wahpeton Sioux Executive Council v. Fort Peck Tribal Executive Board et al
as 4:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Fort Peck Sisseton and Wahpeton Sioux Executive Council
Defendant:
Fort Peck Tribal Executive Board, Fort Peck Tribal Executive Board, US Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
