Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Favian Busby, et al v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 21-5853
Petitioner:
FAVIAN BUSBY, MICHAEL EDGINGTON, FAVIAN BUSBY, on their own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated and others
Respondent:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County, TN Sheriff, SHELBY COUNTY, TN SHERIFF'S OFFICE and FLOYD BONNER, JR., in his official capacity as the Shelby County, TN Sheriff
Moten v. Bonner
as 2:2021cv02564
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Keith Moten
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv02529
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, All Jail Commanding Staff, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Crim. Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Crim. Justice Center, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Mr. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayers v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02383
Defendant:
Cerelyn 'C.J.' Davis, John Doe I, Sergeant Miller (John Doe II) and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sledge v. Shelby County Jail Facility et al
as 2:2021cv02211
Defendant:
Officer Cunningham, Sgt. McGhee, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Dariel M. Sledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Ingle v. Shelby County, et al
as 21-5157
Respondent / Appellee:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Sheriff and SHELBY COUNTY
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNNY L. INGLE
Barnett v. Bonner et al
as 2:2021cv02068
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Regional One and Wellpath
Plaintiff:
Yervin Keith Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Bonner
as 2:2021cv02061
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Petitioner:
Terrell Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. Bonner et al
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., John Chevalier and Gavin A. Smith
Plaintiff:
Marcus Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
