Cases 71 - 80 of 145
Bemley v. Bonner
as 2:2021cv02587
Plaintiff:
Marlo Bemley
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favian Busby, et al v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 21-5853
Petitioner:
FAVIAN BUSBY, MICHAEL EDGINGTON, FAVIAN BUSBY, on their own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated and others
Respondent:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County, TN Sheriff, SHELBY COUNTY, TN SHERIFF'S OFFICE and FLOYD BONNER, JR., in his official capacity as the Shelby County, TN Sheriff
Moten v. Bonner
as 2:2021cv02564
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Keith Moten
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv02529
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, All Jail Commanding Staff, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Crim. Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Crim. Justice Center, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Mr. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Craft et al
as 2:2021cv02469
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Chris Craft, Amy Weirich, James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayers v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02383
Defendant:
Cerelyn 'C.J.' Davis, John Doe I, Sergeant Miller (John Doe II) and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Craft et al
as 2:2021cv02367
Defendant:
James Jones, Chris Craft, Floyd Bonner and others
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Campbell et al
as 2:2021cv02312
Respondent:
District Attorney General of the 30th Judicial District of Tennessee, J.W. Campbell and Floyd Bonner
Petitioner:
Vernon Charles Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cleveland v. Bonner et al
as 2:2021cv02305
Defendant:
Charles Retina Center, Floyd Bonner, Lee Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
