Cases 61 - 70 of 152
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv02287
Petitioner:
Wendolyn Lee
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Chris Craft and Amy Weirich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Bonner
as 2:2022cv02291
Petitioner:
Terry Edwards and Torry Edwards
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Chris Craft and Amy Weirich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demerrick Ratliff v. Shelby County, TN, et al
as 22-5155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMERRICK RATLIFF, fka Demerrick Javon Porter
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN and FLOYD BONNER, JR., Individually and in his official capacity
Jones v. Bonner
as 2:2022cv02113
Petitioner:
Kiara Jones
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scanlan v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Scanlan
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields and Shelby County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Bonner et al
as 2:2021cv02802
Plaintiff:
Marino Frazier
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields and Lee Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Craft et al
as 2:2021cv02774
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Chris Craft, Amy Weirich, James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Shelby County Sheriff et al
as 2:2021cv02736
Plaintiff:
DaRunn Turner
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff, District Attorney's Office, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Bonner et al
as 2:2021cv02669
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Taylor
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Charles Mays, Shelby County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
