Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Routon v. Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Henry Eric Routon
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., Harris, Yancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Routon v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01396
Defendant:
Tammy Williams, Armor Correctional Health Services INC, Dr. Alvin Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Eric Routon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Routon v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00613
Defendant:
Tammy Williams, Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., Dr. Alvin Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Eric Routon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Bailey et al
as 1:2021cv01161
Plaintiff:
Colton Jay Johnson
Defendant:
Mack Bailey, R. Woodson, C Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Routon v. ARMOR Correctional Health Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00362
Defendant:
Dr. J. Fontaine, Joseph W. Walters, Nurse Schnur and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Eric Routon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Routon v. ARMOR Correctional Health Service, Inc. et al
as 7:2020cv00188
Defendant:
Dr. J. Fontaine, Joseph W. Walters, Nurse Schnur and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Eric Routon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 3:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Fontaine Pate
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and Jason Chalmers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Fontaine v. United States of America
as 7:2008cv00227
Plaintiff:
John A. Fontaine
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
