Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Chesapeake Bay Foundation v. Lois Alt
as 13-2200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOIS ALT, d/b/a Eight is Enough, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and WEST VIRGINIA FARM BUREAU
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, FOOD & WATER WATCH and others
Appellant:
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT et al v. MCCARTHY et al
as 1:2013cv01306
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT , FOOD & WATER WATCH , HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Defendant:
GINA MCCARTHY and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
FOOD & WATER WATCH, INC. v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2013cv00672
Plaintiff:
FOOD & WATER WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Kahea, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 12-16445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAHEA and FOOD & WATER WATCH, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICES, MICHAEL D. TOSATTO, Regional Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands Regional Office, ERIC C. SCHWAAB, Assistant Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Tempest Fisheries, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-2001
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEMPEST FISHERIES, LTD, GRACE FISHING, INC., ROANOKE FISH CO., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
New Hampshire Commercial, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1987
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, DAVID ARIPOTCH, RICHARD GRACHEK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
City of New Bedford, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1952
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW BEDFORD, MA and GLOUCESTER, MA
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE LUBCHENCO, Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA) and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
Lovgren v. Locke, et al
as 11-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LOVGREN
Plaintiff:
NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
KAHEA et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
KAHEA and Food & Water Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Michael D. Tosatto, Eric C. Schwaab and others
Cause Of Action: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Locke, et al v. Food & Water Watch
as 11-1303
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Defendant:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATOMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE LUBCHENCO, Administrator of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
Movant - Appellant:
FOOD & WATER WATCH, INC.
Interested Party:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
