Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Henderson v. Champs Sports Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02580
Defendant:
Foot Locker Stores Inc, Champs Sports Inc., Foot Locker Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra
Jacobo v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00447
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and SessionCam Ltd
Plaintiff:
John Jacobo, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10635
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Internet Media Interactive Corp. v. Foot Locker, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv03662
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc and Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Internet Media Interactive Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Vandal-A Industries, Inc. v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04318
Plaintiff:
Vandal-A Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and H&C Headwear Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. et al v. Vizant Technologies, LLC
as 1:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Foot Locker Corporate Services, Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Defendant:
Vizant Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Bynum v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
as 1:2014cv06855
Plaintiff:
Ivin Bynum
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manduley v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04888
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and Foot Locker, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Felix Manduley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
