Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Roger Price v. Warden Forcht Wade Corrtl Ctr
as 14-30349
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER CLAYTON PRICE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN FORCHT WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Jacob Bell, Sr. v. Forcht Wade Correctional Ctr, et al
as 14-30125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB M. BELL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FORCHT WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ANTHONY BATSON and MARTIN L. FORCHT
Dannie Hayward, Sr. v. Forcht Wade Correctional Ctr., et al
as 12-30347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNIE R. HAYWARD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FORCHT WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER COLT PARMER
Dannie Hayward v. Forcht Wade Correctional Ctr, et al
as 12-30321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNIE R. HAYWARD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FORCHT WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER COLT PARMER, CORODNEY SPECKS, CLARENCE WASHINGTON and others
Kately v. Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv02043
Plaintiff:
Michael W Kately
Defendant:
LA Dept of Corrections and Forcht Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Forcht Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2011cv00386
Plaintiff:
Roger Price
Defendant:
Warden Forcht Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Forcht Wade Correctional Center et al
as 5:2010cv01714
Plaintiff:
Jacob M Bell, Sr
Defendant:
Forcht Wade Correctional Center, Anthony Batson and Martin L Forcht
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Madison Correctional Center et al
as 3:2010cv01294
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Kelly
Defendant:
Madison Correctional Center, Jimmy Shivers, Forcht Wade Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. Forcht Wade Correctional Center
as 3:2010cv00890
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Briggs
Defendant:
Warden Forcht Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dotie v. Forcht Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lamont Dotie
Defendant:
Warden Forcht Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
