Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Andersen et al v. First Brands Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Edward Andersen and Sharrel Andersen
Defendant:
First Brands Group, LLC and Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Diemert v. Forest River, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
James Diemert
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hasty v. US Forest Service et al
as 6:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Barry Hasty
Defendant:
US Forest Service and Thomas J. Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Novack v. Jeske et al
as 3:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Kelly Novack
Defendant:
Ken Jeske and Forest Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasty v. US Forest Service
as 6:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Barry Hasty
Defendant:
US Forest Service, Jeri Coon, Connie Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Ahern v. Jefferson County et al
as 3:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Aaron C. Ahren and Aaron Ahern
Defendant:
Jefferson County, City of Madras, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Oregon Wild v. United States Forest Service
as 3:2023cv00935
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild
Defendant:
United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Robles v. OSH Junction City et al
as 6:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
David Robles
Defendant:
OSH Junction City, Forest Ty Team and Blake Preston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
