Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Leysock v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 17-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY LEYSOCK, Ex Rel
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant - Appellee: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Painters and Allied Trades v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 16-8024
Plaintiff - Petitioner: PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 82 HEATH CARE FUND
Plaintiff: MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532), PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532), JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated (09-11532) and others
Defendant - Respondent: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant: WARNER-LAMBERT CO. and PFIZER, INC.
Interested Party: NATALIE LUSTER
MILLER v. DAIICHI SANKYO INC et al
as 2:2015cv00017
Plaintiff: CAROLE H MILLER
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO INC, DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS INC, DAIICHI SANKYO CO LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luster v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 14-2070
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Interested Party - Appellant: NATALIE LUSTER
Plaintiff: TARA JOHNDROW, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRIAN ANSON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, SCOTT A. WILCOX, on behalf of himself & all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC., FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Defendant: PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv13848
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcus, et al v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1290
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDY MARCUS, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated and BONNIE MARCUS, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and FOREST LABORATORIES, INC.
Allied Services Division Welfare Fund et al v. Forest Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10784
Plaintiff: Allied Services Division Welfare Fund and New Mexico UFCW Union's and Employers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund
Defendant: Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jaeckel, et al v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 14-8004
Plaintiff: JAYNE EHRLICH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, ANNA MURRET, UNIVERSAL CARE, INC. and others
Plaintiff - Respondent: ANGELA JAECKEL, MARTHA PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, PETER PALUMBO, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant: PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Defendant - Petitioner: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Interested Party: NATALIE LUSTER
Painters and Allied Trades District Council 82 Health Care Fund v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv13113
Plaintiff: Painters and Allied Trades District Council 82 Health Care Fund
Defendant: Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Forest Laboratories Inc.
Randy Marcus et al v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv11343
Plaintiff: Randy Marcus and Bonnie Marcus
Defendant: Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Forest Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?