Civil Rights Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Forte v. City of Hazleton et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff: Neal Forte
Defendant: City of Hazleton and Brett Green Naprava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02883
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22520
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22395
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22357
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
SMITH et al v. RICHTER et al
as 2:2023cv13456
Plaintiff: MONIQUE SMITH and BARBARA SMITH
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER RICHTER and BOROUGH OF FORT LEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Yaksima v. Tuzinski et al
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff: Amy Yaksima
Defendant: Andrew John Tuzinski, Nickloas Basov, Anthony Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
COHEN v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE et al
as 2:2022cv04788
Plaintiff: MINDY COHEN
Defendant: BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, HINTZE, BENDUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03451
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv20656
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?