Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Moslow et al v. City Of Southaven, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
David Warran Moslow, Jr. and Suzanne Moslow
Defendant:
City Of Southaven, Mississippi, Southaven Police Department, Former Police Chief Macon Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury Venue
K.S.J. et al v. Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services et al
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
K.S.J., Natalie Cuzdey and Gilbert Cuzdey, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, Andrea Sanders, Jill Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hopson v. Frank Berry Court Apt.
as 3:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Edward James Hopson
Defendant:
Frank Berry Court Apt.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Ruredy808, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ruredy808, LLC and Frank Savage
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. RUREDY808, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2020cv00264
Defendant:
RUREDY808, L.L.C. and Frank Savage
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
