Cases 41 - 50 of 569
ABERNATHY et al v. CARLYLE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03603
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ABERNATHY, CEDRICK ARTHUR, LARRY BESS and others
Defendant:
The Carlyle Group, Inc., MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, MANTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SOLOMON v. DECHERT LLP et al
as 1:2022cv03137
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SOLOMON
Defendant:
DECHERT LLP, DAVID NEIL GERRARD, DAVID GRAHAM HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
OLSON v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2022cv03123
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D OLSON and RICHARD D. OLSON
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5259
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HOFFLER v. KENDALL
as 1:2022cv02744
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HOFFLER
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LASSITER v. ADERHOLT et al
as 1:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, RICK ALLEN, JODEY ARRINGTON and others
Debtor:
RANDY WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
ROBINSON v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2022cv02590
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L ROBINSON, III and BOBBY L. ROBINSON, II
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5228
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roger Shekar v. James Duff, et al
as 22-5211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roger Shekar
Defendant / Appellee:
James Duff, Anthony Scirica, Rebecca Pallmeyer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
