Cases 1 - 10 of 241
Bonaparte v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Alfred Bonaparte
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Shane Weber, Bradley O. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Moore v. Warden of W.C.I.
as 23-7263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT G. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF W.C.I. SHANE WEBER, NURSE TAMI OF W.C.I., DOCTOR OF W.C.I. JOHN DOE and others
Travis Terry v. Frank Bishop
as 23-6959
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVIS DAVON TERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK BISHOP, Warden of North Branch Correctional Institution, VICKI BALLOU-WATTS, Judge, Baltimore County, ANNE MARIE GERRING, Public Defender and others
Brandon Roberts v. Thomas Sires
as 23-6876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS SIRES, Captain, FRANK BISHOP, Warden, JACK JOHNS, Shift Commander and others
Mills v. Bishop
as 1:2022cv02538
Petitioner:
Earl Mills
Respondent:
Warden Frank Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Davis v. Frank Bishop
as 22-6857
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK BISHOP and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Brandon Roberts v. Thomas Sires
as 22-6763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS SIRES, Captain, FRANK BISHOP, Warden, JEFFREY NINES, Assistant Warden and others
Mills v. Bishop et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Vaughn Whiteman, O. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Durrell Lemon v. Frank Bishop
as 22-6475
Petitioner / Appellant:
DURRELL LEMON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK BISHOP and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Terry v. Frank Bishop et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
Travis Terry
Respondent:
Frank Bishop, Vicki Ballou-Watts, Anne Marie Gerring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
