Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Roger v. Whitney
as 1:2014cv00198
Petitioner:
Saint Dennis VanDyke Roger
Respondent:
Frank D. Whitney
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Howard et al
as 5:2014ct03196
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Malcolm J. Howard, Frank D. Whitney and James C. Dever, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant:
ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cloud v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2012cv00775
Petitioner:
William Roosevelt Hill Cloud
Respondent:
United States of America, Kurt W. Meyers, Michael Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cloud v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2012ct03203
Plaintiff:
William Roosevelt Hill Cloud
Defendant:
United States Of America, Kurt W. Meyers, Michael Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Benton v. Whitney et al
as 3:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Stanley Benton
Defendant:
Frank D. Whitney, Peter Adolf and Cortney Escaravage
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Thompkins et al
as 3:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
Juan Thomas Mason
Defendant:
Anne M. Thompkins, Frank D. Whitney, David C. Keesler and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart v. Killian et al
as 1:2007cv08095
Petitioner:
Leroy Stuart
Respondent:
Janice Killian and Frank D. Whitney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stuart v. Killian et al
as 1:2007cv07670
Plaintiff:
Leroy Stuart
Defendant:
Janice Killian and Frank D. Whitney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart v. Killian et al
as 5:2007hc02105
Petitioner:
Leroy A. Stuart
Defendant:
Janice Killian and Frank D. Whitney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
