Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Norman v. Livingston et al
as 1:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Frank Hoke, Vicky Barrows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
John A Rupert, Patrick Copper, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Werner et al
as 4:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Donald Adkins
Defendant:
John Werner, Mary Karl, Damon Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arcade Comeaux, Jr. v. Beach, et al
as 13-20696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCADE COMEAUX, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BEACH, RICK THALER and FRANK HOKE
Arcade Comeaux, Jr. v. Darrell Sutton, et al
as 13-20566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCADE JOSEPH COMEAUX, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRELL SUTTON, MARK BISCAMP, ROBERT JENKINS, JR. and others
Comeaux, Jr v. Beach et al
as 4:2013cv02530
Plaintiff:
Arcade Comeaux, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Beach, Rick Thaler and Frank Hoke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhonnie Simmons v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 13-20399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RHONNIE ODELL SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, FRANK HOKE, Access to Courts and J D SEIGLE, Access to Courts
Timothy Harriman v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 13-40717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, FRANK HOKE and JOHN BECRAFT
Cooper v. Capt. Jamison et al
as 2:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Joe Cooper
Defendant:
Capt. Jamison, R. Stamm, Capt. Benevides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Cooper v. M. Barber, et al
as 13-40652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BARBER, C. MONROE, M PEREZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
