Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Bailey et al v. Zendesk, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Brian Bailey and Scott Franklin
Defendant:
Zendesk, Inc., Mikkel Svane, Archana Agrawal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Houghton et al v. Leshner et al
as 3:2022cv07781
Plaintiff:
Amanda Houghton, Charles Douglas and Susan Franklin
Defendant:
Robert Leshner, Geoffrey Hayes, Compound DAO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Martin v. Kim et al
as 3:2021cv02091
Plaintiff:
Debra Martin
Defendant:
O. C. Kim, Yun J. Lee, David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd
Harwood v. Kim et al
as 3:2021cv01837
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harwood
Defendant:
OC Kim, David Brown, Joon Won Jyoung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Nosirrah Management, LLC v. Franklin Wireless Corp. et al
as 3:2021cv01316
Plaintiff:
Nosirrah Management, LLC
Defendant:
Franklin Wireless Corp. and O.C. Kim
Bonnie L. Franklin v. DiDi Global Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05486
Plaintiff:
Bonnie L. Franklin
Defendant:
DiDi Global Inc., Will Wei Cheng, Jean Qing Liu and others
Petitioner:
Fah Liew, Allen Floyd, Tao Zha and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Franklin v. Weisler et al
as 4:2021cv04805
Defendant:
HP Inc., Carl Bass, Margaret C. Whitman and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Franklin
Ali v. Franklin Wireless Corp. et al
as 3:2021cv00687
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Usman Ali and Gergely Csaba
Defendant:
OC Kim, David Brown and Franklin Wireless Corp.
Petitioner:
Jack Pape and Barbara Pape
Thomas v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02477
Defendant:
Peder K. Jensen, Thomas Civik, Carol Schafer and others
Plaintiff:
Satheesh Thomas
Wheeler v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02097
Defendant:
Peder K. Jensen, Thomas Civik, Carol Schafer and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
