Cases 21 - 30 of 249
Charles TalbertIn re: Charles Talbert
as 22-2293
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES TALBERT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, Deputy Secretary for Administration of the DOC, TABB BICKELL, Executive Deputy Secretary for the Institutional Operations of DOC and others
SWITZER v. FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
KERRY L. SWITZER, JR.
Defendant:
FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Healthcare Real Estate Partners, LLC v. Summit Healthcare REIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Healthcare Real Estate Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Summit Healthcare REIT, Inc., John Jacob Speckmann, Arnold Goldenbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James Riffin v. New Freedom Borough, et al
as 22-8004
Petitioner:
JAMES RIFFIN
Respondent:
CGA LAW FIRM, FRANKLIN LAND DEVELOPMENT LP, FRANKLIN SQUARE VENTURES LLC and others
Dolan v. HollyFrontier Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01670
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dolan
Defendant:
HollyFrontier Corporation, Franklin Myers, Michael C. Jennings and others
Jacobs v. HollyFrontier Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01668
Plaintiff:
Stanley Jacobs
Defendant:
HollyFrontier Corporation, Franklin Myers, Michael C. Jennings and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv18127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
