Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Pryor v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Pryor, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Williams, Mr. Clint Davis and Mr. Ross Maurice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Chestnut, et al
as 7:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Pryor, Jr.
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail, Ms. Chestnut, Ms. Lynda Mood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Napier v. Ohai et al
as 7:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Walter Randolph Napier, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul C. Ohai, MD, A. David Robinson, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrusco v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Fred Carrusco
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yahweh v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh, Robert Gabriel Love, Gabriel Alexander Antonio and others
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Carl K. Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hearn v. Leabough et al
as 3:2020cv00618
Defendant:
L.J. Leabough, E. Blackwell and S. Poarch
Plaintiff:
Fred T. Hearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Edmonds
as 7:2019cv00796
Respondent:
Larry Edmonds
Petitioner:
Fred Eugene Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LeGrand v. Blair Meyers Law Firm et al
as 1:2019cv01464
Plaintiff:
Martell A. LeGrand
Defendant:
Risperdal Team Fred and Whole Faculty Staff, Blair Meyers Law Firm and Arnold Anitkin Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrington v. Clarke
as 3:2019cv00805
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Petitioner:
Fred M. Carrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv00722
Petitioner:
Fred L. Johnson
Respondent:
Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation, Jason Wilson and Anita Schlank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
