Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Campbell v. Butler et al
as 6:2010cv03601
Petitioner:
Gerald Campbell
Respondent:
Freddie Butler and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woodburck Noe v. Alabama Board of Pardons, et al
as 10-14698
Petitioner - Appellant:
WOODBURCK NOE
Respondent - Appellee:
ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, FREDDIE BUTLER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Bass v. Butler et al
as 2:2010cv02445
Plaintiff:
Tommy Bass
Defendant:
Freddie Butler, Chris Markham, Amy Williford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Butler et al
as 2:2010cv02040
Petitioner:
Jermaine Mitchell
Respondent:
Freddie Butler and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Butler et al
as 6:2010cv01867
Petitioner:
Donnie Hamilton
Respondent:
Freddie Butler and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Cummings et al
as 2:2010cv00583
Plaintiff:
Shirley Faye Miller
Defendant:
John Cummings , Freddie Butler , Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guyton v. Butler et al
as 6:2010cv01488
Petitioner:
Dennis Guyton
Respondent:
Freddie Butler and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rickman v. Butler et al
as 6:2010cv01356
Petitioner:
Shane Alan Rickman
Respondent:
Freddie Butler and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. McCracken et al
as 6:2010cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Mitchell
Defendant:
Joy McCracken, Gregory Naydin, Freddie Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Allen et al
as 6:2010cv01103
Plaintiff:
Arthur Long
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Freddie Butler, Lillie A Williford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
