Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Clesi v. Fredrick
as 1:2017cv01588
Plaintiff:
Ronald O'Dell Clesi, Jr
Defendant:
Fredrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlgren v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv06854
Plaintiff:
Fredrick L. Carlgren
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold et al v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv06738
Plaintiff:
Melinda Arnold and Fredrick Arnold
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payton, et al., v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03974
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. L.L.C. , Hospira Worldwide, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Payton and Fredrick Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarado v. Boutte
as 3:2017cv00339
Petitioner:
Staci Alvarado
Respondent:
Fredrick Boutte and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Spears et al
as 2:2017cv05078
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Scott
Defendant:
Darren Spears, Edward Gomez, Jim Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lutin v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04419
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Lutin
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vereen v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2017cv02736
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Vereen
Defendant:
Darrell Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burnham v. Franklin et al
as 1:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
Rockey Burnham
Defendant:
Scott Franklin and Fredricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00173
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
