Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ellsworth #350872 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2023cv08576
Petitioner:
Richard Fredrick Ellsworth
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pratt v. USA
as 4:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
Fredrick Ronald Pratt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hefley v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Gerald Fredrick Hefley
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Duran, Unknown Dickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03688
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Fredrick W Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00120
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambers v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00030
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frey v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02232
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Richard Fredrick Frey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodgers v. Snow et al
as 2:2018cv01760
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Rodgers
Defendant:
David Snow, Steven D Skinner and Unknown McQuillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01442
Petitioner:
Lon Fredrick Collier
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
