Cases 51 - 60 of 136
Green v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2022cv02058
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Green
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Watson v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Watson Jr.
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Watson v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2022cv00072
Not Classified By Court:
Jimmie Watson Jr.
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Marshall v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
Latosha Marshall
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mendoza v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2022cv00057
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation and Cindy Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Olson v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jordan Olson
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burleson v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv01450
Plaintiff:
Artie Burleson
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation and Reliance Financial Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Crotts v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
Alan Nelson Crotts
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
