Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Friends of Animals v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 22-1992
Petitioner:
Friends of Animals
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
Friends of Animals v. Bernhardt et al
as 3:2020cv01476
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Aurelia Skipwith
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Friends Of Animals, Inc. v. Ross et al
as 3:2020cv01312
Defendant:
Wilbur Ross and National Marine Fisheries Service
Plaintiff:
Friends Of Animals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Friends of Animals v. Soller et al
as 2:2016cv06006
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Defendant:
K. Christopher Soller and United States National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Friends of Animals v. National Park Service et al
as 1:2016cv06006
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Defendant:
National Park Service and Christopher Soller
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Friends of Animals v. Ashe et al
as 1:2015cv02202
Defendant:
Daniel M. Ashe and Sally Jewell
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Friends of Animals v. Clay et al
as 1:2013cv07293
Defendant:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, William Clay and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Friends of Animals, Inc v. Bridgeport
as 11-3033
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals, Incorporated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lisa Zalaski
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Bridgeport, Police Department and James J. Honis, I/O, Deputy Chief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
