Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Fuller v. Cooper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00584
Plaintiff: Duane Fuller
Defendant: Cooper, Candy and Meza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULLER v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00154
Petitioner: KENLEY PEIEAIR FULLER
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FULLER v. WARDEN
as 2:2020cv00525
Respondent: WARDEN
Petitioner: ROLAND EUGENE FULLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FULLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02250
Petitioner: BRANDON FULLER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fletcher v. Westville Medical Staff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00673
Defendant: Mr Sevier, Mrs Alm, D Lewis and others
Plaintiff: Jason Kashmir Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Sevier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00376
Plaintiff: Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Defendant: Greg Sheward, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Captain Earhardt and others
Not Yet Classified: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00126
Plaintiff: Kyle Smith, Joe Riley, Greg Robinson and others
Defendant: CLU Screening, Ken Faulk, Reggie Nevels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff: WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant: BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULLER v. USA
as 1:2016cv01550
Petitioner: CHARLES E. FULLER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FULLER v. USA
as 1:2016cv01559
Petitioner: ARMAND RAY FULLER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?