Cases 1 - 8 of 8
General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04062
Plaintiff:
General Motors LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Kunde Industrial Investment Co., Ltd., Shenzhen chezhihui Trade Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Deco v. n
as 17-1888
Petitioner:
In re: JIANGMEN KINWAI FURNITURE DECORATION CO. LTD
:
, , and others
In re: Jiangmen Kinwai
as 15-2215
Petitioner:
In re: JIANGMEN KINWAI FURNITURE DECORATION CO. LTD
:
, , and others
Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co. LTD et al v. International Market Centers, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01419
Defendant:
IHFC Properties, LLC, IMC Manager, LLC, IMC OP GP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co. LTD and Kinwai USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
NOT USED
as 2:2015cv01411
Defendant:
IHFC Properties, LLC, IMC Manager, LLC, IMC OP GP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co. LTD and Kinwai USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
IMC Manager, LLC et al v. Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co. Ltd.
as 3:2015mc00117
Respondent:
Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co. Ltd.
Petitioner:
IMC Manager, LLC , International Market Centers LP and IMC OP, LLC
Zuo Modern Contemporary, Inc. v. Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co. LTD
as 3:2015mc00121
Petitioner:
Zuo Modern Contemporary, Inc.
Respondent:
Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co. Ltd.
JIANGMEN KINWAI FURNITURE DECORATION CO. LTD v. IHFC PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00689
Plaintiff:
JIANGMEN KINWAI FURNITURE DECORATION CO. LTD
Defendant:
IHFC PROPERTIES, LLC and ZUO MODERN CONTEMPORARY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
