Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Kilian Hale v. Glenn Pacheco, et al
as 23-15578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KILIAN GREGOIRE HALE, named as Kilian G Hale
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENN PACHECO, Warden of ASPC, Tucson Complex, J MARTINEZ, Deputy Warden of ASPC, Tucson, Whetstone Unit, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does - Unknown correctional officers, at ASPC, Tucson, Whetstone Unit and others
Carroll v. Hale, et al.
as 1:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
Lynn Jason Carroll
Defendant:
Dale G Hale, Canyon County Jail and Dale G. Haile Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hayde v. Zamora et al
as 2:2019cv00432
Defendant:
G. Hale, D. Foston, T. Foss and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Ryan Hayde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delarm v. Growe et al
as 2:2015cv02258
Plaintiff:
Michael Delarm
Defendant:
G Growe, Davis, S. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Roddrick, et al.
as 2:2014cv02458
Plaintiff:
Tajhikeem Woods
Defendant:
Roddrick, A. Arnold and G. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hakim Ali-Akbar v. Michael McDonald, et al
as 14-15994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAKIM ALI-AKBAR, AKA Fredrick Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCDONALD, BIVINS, D. DAVEY and others
Jenkins v. Lares, et al.
as 2:2013cv02273
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Lares, Barker, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Foulk, et al
as 2:2013cv01753
Plaintiff:
Saadhi Abdul Coleman
Defendant:
Fred Foulk, T. Swartz, P. Arnwald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jenkins v. Barnes, et al.
as 2:2013cv00596
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Ron Barnes, Albonico, R. Plainer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali-Akbar v. McDonald et al
as 2:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Hakim Ali-Akbar
Defendant:
Michael McDonald, Bivins, D Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
