Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Clervrain et al v. Brimmer et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Wislene Casy and others
Defendant:
Philip A. Brimmer, David DLG Atalig, Tom Kucharski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pramis et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv00008
Petitioner:
Cesar G. Lopez, Alilua Panapa Peteru, Veisinia Tilisa Peteru and others
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Tracy Renaud
Intervenor:
Kraisorn Chaijaroen and Samarn Chaikhamjan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Demapan et al v. Zeng's American Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Katrina del Gallego Demapan , MA. Gina Tiozon , Mary Jane G. Muhi and others
Defendant:
Zeng's American Corp. and Jin Dong Zeng
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00018
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pangelinan v. USA
as 1:2016cv00011
Petitioner:
John G. Pangelinan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Commonwealth Utilities Corporation et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Utilities Corporation , Josilito Agulto , Claro V. Bicol and others
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson , Saarah Saldana and Leon Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. Murphy, III et al
as 1:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Stephen J. Murphy, III, Carol Cohron, James E. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: E W G E Corporation, a Corporation
as 1:2014mc00003
Taxpayer:
E W G E Corporation
In Re: Victor G. Barrett & Vicki L. Johnson
as 1:2012mc00017
Taxpayer:
Victor G. Barrett and Vicki L. Johnson
Flores vs. First Hawaiian Bank and Union Bank of California
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Flores
Defendant:
First Hawaiian Bank and Union Bank of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
