Cases 1 - 10 of 10
IOU Central Inc. v. G&B International Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
IOU Central Inc. doing business as IOU Financial Inc.
Defendant:
G&B International Logistics, Inc. and Joon Hwan Tae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04600
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ADAMS v. MOORE et al
as 5:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ADAMS
Defendant:
G B MOORE, III, W A PRIOR, JR and STEPHEN A BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley et al v. Benton et al
as 1:2018cv01518
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Bradley , R. B. , T. B. and others
Defendant:
Casey Benton, C. M. Franklin, L. O. Niemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. BUSHWAY et al
as 5:2013cv00384
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND T HALL, III
Defendant:
GREGORY L BUSHWAY, FRED BRIGHT and G B MOORE, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Bushway et al
as 1:2013cv03243
Plaintiff:
Raymond T. Hall, III
Defendant:
Gregory L. Bushway, Fred Bright and G. B. Moore, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Tjoflat et al
as 1:2012cv01482
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
G. B. Tjoflat, J. F. Dubina, W. B. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. G. B. Asphalt Paving, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
Gary Adams
Defendant:
G. B. Asphalt Paving, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walters v. Nix et al
as 1:2007cv01419
Petitioner:
Jerry Walters
Respondent:
Milton Nix, Jr., E. Walker, G. Hammonds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walters v. Nix et al
as 1:2007cv00076
Petitioner:
Jerry Walters
Respondent:
Milton Nix, Jr., E. Walker, G. B. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
