Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LOPEZ et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv18898
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF IRENE C. LOPEZ and JAMES G. LOPEZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC)
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv10917
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
RITA G. LOPEZ
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv03839
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Plaintiff:
MATILDE G. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hittler et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv17106
Plaintiff:
Dana Root, Hector Calvario, Juana Guerrero and others
Defendant:
PTI Union, LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOPEZ GUTIERREZ et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv00582
Plaintiff:
MARIA G LOPEZ GUTIERREZ and MOISES LAGUNA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv04175
Plaintiff:
GLEN G. LOPEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LOPEZ v. CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al
as 2:2012cv04976
Plaintiff:
JAMES G LOPEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PLAINFIELD , PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOSEPH MULLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
