Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Jason Latrell Thomas v. G. Marhsall et al
as 2:2022cv05446
Plaintiff:
Jason Latrell Thomas
Defendant:
G. Marshall, J. Villa, G. Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase, Jr. v. Maryland Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv02174
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Corrections, Eastern Correctional Institution, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Chase, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Troy Alexander Sanders v. G. Marshall
as 5:2020cv00885
Petitioner:
Troy Alexander Sanders
Respondent:
G Marshall
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Marc Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Sanders v. Marshall
as 1:2020cv00002
Petitioner:
Troy Alexander Sanders
Respondent:
G. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tonney Killensworth v. D. Godfrey, et al.
as 2:2019cv06029
Defendant:
R. Aguirre, D. Godfrey, B. Legier and others
Plaintiff:
Tonney Killensworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Killensworth v. Godfrey, et al.
as 1:2019cv00943
Defendant:
R. Aguirre, D. Godfrey, B. Legier and others
Plaintiff:
Tonney Killensworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Joe Espinosa v. G. Marshall
as 2:2019cv02468
Respondent:
Chief G. Marshall
Petitioner:
Carlos Joe Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Springfield v. Marshall et al
as 2:2018cv01073
Plaintiff:
Ciron B. Springfield
Defendant:
G. Marshall, D Neel and M. Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy Roy Keeton v. G. Marshall et al
as 2:2017cv01213
Defendant:
T. Chapman and G. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Tommy Roy Keeton
Antoine LeBlanc v. John Soto, et al
as 16-56685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE LEBLANC
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN SOTO, in both individual and official capacities, D. ULSTAD, in both individual and official capacities, G. BIAGGINI, in both individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
