Cases
James Schneller v. Marjorie Zitomer, et al
as 15-2235
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES D. SCHNELLER
Defendant - Appellee: MARJORIE ZITOMER, G. RICHARD SCHNELLER, T. SERGEANT PEPPER, Esquire and others
SCHNELLER v. ZITOMER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv04370
Plaintiff: JAMES D. SCHNELLER
Defendant: MARJORIE ZITOMER, G. RICHARD SCHNELLER, T. SERGEANT PEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
James Schneller, et al v. Fox Subacute at Clara Burke, et al
as 09-4577
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES D. SCHNELLER, HEIRS AND BENEFICIARIES OF MARJORIE C. SCHNELLER, BY JAMES D. SCHNELLER, TRUSTEE AD LITEM
Plaintiff: ESTATE MARJORIE SCHNELLER
Defendant - Appellee: FOX SUBACUTE AT CLARA BURKE, GARY DRIZIN, M.D., DEBBIE MCCOY, R.N. and others
Schneller, et al v. Crozer Chester Med, et al
as 09-3855
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES D. SCHNELLER
Plaintiff: ESTATE MARJORIE SCHNELLER, BY AND THROUGH JAMES D. SCHNELLER, TRUSTEE AD LITEM and ESTATE GEORGE SCHNELLER, BY AND THROUGH PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE JAMES D. SCHNELLER
Defendant - Appellee: CROZER CHESTER MED, E. HEFFELFINGER, HERMAN MCGILL and others
Debtor - Appellee: LALITHA GURIJALA
Defendant: MARJORIE ZITOMER, DAWN HEFFELFINGER, GURPREET KOCHAR and others
SCHNELLER et al v. CROZER CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01479
Plaintiff: JAMES D. SCHNELLER, ESTATE OF MARJORIE SCHNELLER, MARJORIE ZITOMER and others
Defendant: CROZER CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER, SUBURBAN PULMONARY MEDICINE, AND PRINCIPALS, DANIEL DUPONT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
SCHNELLER et al v. FOX SUBACUTE AT CLARA BURKE et al
as 2:2008cv01076
Plaintiff: JAMES D. SCHNELLER, ESTATE OF MARJORIE SCHNELLER and MARJORIE ZITOMER
Defendant: FOX SUBACUTE AT CLARA BURKE, GARY DRIZIN, DEBBIE MCCOY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?