Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Riddell v. Frye et al
as 1:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
David W. Riddell
Defendant:
Officer Frye, V. Coy, G. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Riddell v. Frye et al
as 2:2021cv01188
Plaintiff:
David W. Riddell
Defendant:
Officer Frye, V. Coy, G. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2016cv05774
Plaintiff:
Kate G. Sullivan
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeffrey Walker v. W. Sullivan
as 13-15503
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY E. WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
W. G. SULLIVAN
Tenessia Posey, et al v. Covidien Inc., et al
as 13-15236
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TENESSIA POSEY, MEGAN STINSON, BARBARA OLSON and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COVIDIEN INC.
Tenessia Posey, et al v. Covidien Inc.
as 13-80019
Plaintiff - Respondent:
TENESSIA POSEY, MEGAN STINSON, BARBARA OLSON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
COVIDIEN INC.
Posey -v- McKesson
as 3:2012cv05939
Plaintiff:
Tenessia Posey , Megan Stinson , Barbara Olson and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , Aaipharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-15264
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00004
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Theodore Borreson v. William G Sullivan et al
as 2:2007cv05309
Plaintiff:
Theodore Borreson, Theodore Borreson and Theodore Borreson
Defendant:
William G Sullivan, S & S Computer Services, Inc., Certegy Check Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
