Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lewis v. Richmond Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
Officer Urban, Richmond Police Department, Officer Levy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rials v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv00688
Defendant:
L. Godfrey, Thomas Terry, L. R. Green and others
Plaintiff:
Roneil Rials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United American Insurance Company v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv00522
Plaintiff:
United American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Delos G. Smith, IV , Laura B. Smith , United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. Royal et al
as 3:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ray G. Smith
Defendant:
William Royal and Fleetmaster Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary v. McDonnell, etc., et al
as 2:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Gary
Defendant:
Robert F. McDonnell, City of Richmond Police, Bryan T. Worwood, City of Richmond Jail Sheriff, Michelle B. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Esquire v. Purnell, Esquire
as 1:2011cv00922
Plaintiff:
Cynthia G. Smith, Esquire
Defendant:
Timothy Purnell, Esquire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith, Jr. v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00137
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Herald G. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv09713
Plaintiff:
Harold G. Smith
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Amsted Rail Company, Inc., The Budd Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hyatt et al v. The Town of Wytheville
as 7:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Akers, Leigh Ann Altizer, Lonnie C. Anders and others
Defendant:
The Town of Wytheville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
