Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clary Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv01784
Plaintiff:
Jamel G.E. Clary Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Boatman v. Riddle et al
as 2:2016cv00247
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Dotty Riddle, Sarah Senter, Danielle E. Koskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. G.E. Capital Retail Bank
as 6:2014cv00662
Plaintiff:
Deidre Johnson
Defendant:
G.E. Capital Retail Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. Combs et al
as 3:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
Willie Albert Smith
Defendant:
Melanee A. Combs and G.E. Jett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv14476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv60346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blome v. Gentile et al
as 3:2011cv01000
Plaintiff:
Richard Blome
Defendant:
Samuel Gentile, Mr. Schmidt, T.J. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Featherlite, Inc.
as 6:2010cv01450
Plaintiff:
G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Featherlite, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bemiller et al v. JC Penney Corporation
as 6:2007cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tim E. Bemiller and Connie D. Bemiller
Defendant:
J.C. Penny Corporation, J.C. Penny Corporation and G.E. Money Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
