Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dupuis et al v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv14007
Plaintiff:
Christian Dupuis and Berthe Mailhot
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. and Austin Holzmacher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernandez v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
as 2:2015cv00771
Plaintiff:
Lucille Fernandez
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Frias et al v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
as 9:2015cv80847
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frias and Rosaly Ramirez
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Jeter v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc
as 2:2015cv00895
Plaintiff:
Kireem Jeter
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walton v. Addison Reserve Master Property Owners Association, Inc. et al
as 9:2014cv81586
Plaintiff:
Gary Walton
Defendant:
Addison Reserve Master Property Owners Association, Inc. , Lang Management Company, Inc. and G4S Secure solutions, (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Rodriguez v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv24574
Plaintiff:
Victor Rodriguez
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. , Alutiiq-Mele, LLC and Edwin Arambola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013mc00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
