Cases 1 - 10 of 2,481
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff:
ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Rivera-Lopez
as 24-1400
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JUAN GABRIEL RIVERA-LOPEZ
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Gabriel v. Forghani, et al.
as 24-2677
Plaintiff:
ADAM CHRISTIAN GABRIEL
Defendant:
SHAWN FORGHANI and COUNTY OF SONOMA
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Alvaro Jerez-Esquivel, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-11266
Petitioner:
ALVARO BENITO JEREZ-ESQUIVEL, LINDA MORENO CRUZ, ALVARO GABRIEL JEREZ-MORENO and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pop-Ba, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2475
Petitioner:
CONSUELO POP-BA and NELSON GABRIEL CAB-POP
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
