Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 217
Carlos De Aza v. USA
as 24-11326
Petitioner: CARLOS GABRIEL DE AZA
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gabriel Nock v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11180
Petitioner: GABRIEL BRIAN NOCK
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Frazier v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Defendant: Montgomery County Jail and T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nock, Gabriel v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv60144
Plaintiff: Gabriel Brian Nock
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albert Young v. Rashaun Robinson, et al
as 24-10210
Plaintiff: ALBERT DEMETRIUS YOUNG
Defendant: RASHAUN ROBINSON, SARAFINO LOVETTO, GABRIEL BROOKS and others
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 8:2024cv00199
Petitioner: Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent: Jennifer A. Broton and Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Broton
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner: Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent: Jennifer A. Broton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bowen v. Prock et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Gabriel Nathaniel Bowen
Defendant: Prock, Pittman, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 5:2023cv00674
Petitioner: Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13729
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?