Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01073
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
KING et al v. VOYAGER 888, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00991
Plaintiff: MOMO JOHNSON, DORA KING, JADA MORALES and others
Defendant: JEFFREY SCHAEFFER, VOYAGER 888 LLC, SAXTON-GABRIELLE MIILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03738
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MONTALVO CAMPILLO et al v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv03501
Defendant: KENNETH CUCCINELLI and CHAD WOLF
Plaintiff: CESAR GABRIEL COBOS MONTALVO and ROSA MARIA MONTALVO CAMPILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION, INC.
as 1:2020cv03488
Plaintiff: GABRIELLE THOR FERNANDO DAVIS
Defendant: THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION, INC. and CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION, INC.
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv03378
Plaintiff: GABRIELLE THOR FERNANDO DAVIS and NO PARTY
Defendant: THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03348
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
AMADOR v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND FIREARMS
as 1:2020cv03321
Plaintiff: GABRIEL AMADOR
Defendant: BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND FIREARMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02941
Defendant: JESSICA HURST, MATTHEW ZECHMAN, JOHN SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL NEAL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02631
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?