Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Padilla v. Forest Construction LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01193
Defendant:
Forest Construction LLC and Fernando Miranda Colores
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Padilla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clardy et al v. Byerly et al
as 6:2018cv01200
Defendant:
Todd Byerly, Danielle Fuzi, Jane Jung and others
Plaintiff:
Unnamed O.D.O.C. Prisoners and Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duclairon v. LGBTQ Community & Grace Community Church Klan et al
as 3:2018cv01095
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ernst Duclairon
Defendant:
Gabrielle Franklin, Guy Franklin, LGBTQ Community & Grace Community Church Klan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fauley v. Mosman et al
as 3:2017cv01656
Plaintiff:
Robynne A. Fauley
Defendant:
Erick J. Haynie, Marco A. Hernandez, Michael W. Mosman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Imbler et al v. Premera Blue Cross
as 3:2017cv01648
Plaintiff:
Sharif Ailey, April Allred, Catherine Bushman and others
Defendant:
Premera Blue Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Subramaniam v. Richards et al
as 3:2017cv01627
Defendant:
Ercik J. Haynie, Marco A. Hernandez, Michael W. Mosman and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Subramaniam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gabriel B. Parton Lee
as 3:2017ad00125
In Re:
Gabriel B. Parton Lee
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Cardenas Mansilla et al v. Express Messenger Systems, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Cardenas Mansilla and Gabriel Cardenas-Riumallo
Defendant:
Express Messenger Systems, Inc., Daniel Singeorzan and Dorel Singeorzan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
