Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Garland AdamsIn re: Garland Adams
as 23-3106
Petitioner:
In re: GARLAND ADAMS
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
ADAMS v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv04523
Petitioner:
GARLAND ADAMS
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garland Adams v. Correctional Emergency Respons, et al
as 20-2693
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM, ("Cert") and SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FURGUSON, ("Furguson")
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARLAND ADAMS
ADAMS v. CORRECTIONAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM ("CERT") et al
as 2:2019cv03301
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FURGUSON, THOSE WHOSE INVOLVEMENTS AND/OR IDENTITIES ARE PRESENTLY NOT KNOWN, JANE AND/OR JOHN DOE CERT TEAM MEMBER(S) and others
Plaintiff:
GARLAND ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2013cv03538
Petitioner:
GARLAND ADAMS
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
