Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FONTANEZ v. KUHN et al.
as 1:2022cv03046
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FONTANEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER VICTORIA L. KUHN, AL SOLANIK, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMART v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2019cv21622
Defendant:
REX UTUK, MICHAEL MCLAUGHLIN, TIM GASKILL and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK SMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABI-HANNA et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2019cv17837
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TREZZA, ROSE M. CAMPANARO, HAROLD CAREY and others
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12752
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GASKILL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv10757
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GASKILL and CONSTANCE GASKILL
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BW/IP Inc. , BLACKMER and others
Cross_claimant:
MILTON ROY, LLC , BW/IP Inc. and EATON HYDRAULICS LLC
Cross_defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BALTIMORE AIRCOIL COMPANY, INC. , BLACKMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
GASKILL et al v. WESTERN FLYER EXPRESS et al
as 3:2009cv05194
Plaintiff:
DENNIS GASKILL and BARBARA GASKILL
Defendant:
WESTERN FLYER EXPRESS, RAYMOND ZINSMASTER and XYZ COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CRINO v. BEGLEY & GASKILL et al
as 2:2007cv04675
Plaintiff:
ROSALINDA O. CRINO
Defendant:
BEGLEY & GASKILL and ROBERT F. GASKILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
