Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Weatherford v. GATX Corporation et al
as 6:2021cv01330
Plaintiff:
Sean Weatherford
Defendant:
GATX Corporation, Joe Budzisz, Cody Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roosevelt Collins v. Double J. Marine, L.L.C., et al
as 19-30659
Defendant / Appellee:
GATX CORPORATION, BRYNMARK MARINE SERVICES, INCORPORATED and DOUBLE J. MARINE, L.L.C., as owner and owner pro hac vice, of the M/V Miss Sylvia
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROOSEVELT COLLINS
Thomas v. GATX Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00359
Plaintiff:
Chnek Thomas
Defendant:
CF Industries, Inc., GATX Corporation, CF Industries Nitrogen, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins v. Double J. Marine, L.L.C., et al
as 2:2019cv01415
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Collins
Defendant:
Brynmark Marine Services, Inc., GATX Corporation and Double J Marine, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Allemand v. Anco Insulations, Inc., et al
as 3:2018cv01019
Defendant:
The McCarty Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand Company, Goulds Pumps, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Allemand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Masterank America, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv15879
Plaintiff:
Eric P Jones
Defendant:
Masterank America, Inc., Masterank Wax, Inc., ABC Rail Car Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dykes et al v. Shell Oil Company et al
as 2:2013cv04934
Plaintiff:
Thomas C Dykes and Johnnie Dykes
Defendant:
Shell Oil Company , Shell Chemical LP , John W. Stone Oil Distributor, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Amy Sampson v. GATX Corporation, et al
as 12-30406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMY AVERY SAMPSON, Individually and on behalf of KAS and TLS
Defendant - Appellee:
GATX CORPORATION and CLIFTON KIRBY
The Lubrizol Corporation v. GATX Corporation
as 4:2009cv02546
Plaintiff:
The Lubrizol Corporation
Defendant:
GATX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
