Cases 21 - 30 of 194
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Utter et al
as 6:2022cv01711
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., Geico General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
D.C. Ronald Jack Travis Utter, No Utter Way doing business as Preferred Injury Physicians, Halifax Chiropractic & Injury Clinic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Solomon Halioua, M.D., P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv05320
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Solomon Halioua, M.D., P.C., Solomon Halioua, M.D. and John Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Titan Wellness Center of Fort Myers, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2022cv61648
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Titan Wellness Center of Fort Myers, L.L.C., D.C. Hoa H. Nguyen, ISO-Diagnostics Testing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. CARING PAIN MANAGEMENT PC et al
as 2:2022cv05017
Defendant:
CARING PAIN MANAGEMENT PC, CAREON PAIN MANAGEMENT, JINGHUI XIE, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Sood et al
as 1:2022cv03825
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Rahul Sood, D.O., Sood Medical Practice, LLC, Mid-State Anesthesia Consultants LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02639
Defendant:
JULIA IOFFE, M.D., CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC doing business as ACUPUNCTURE & CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC OF N.J., TAE YOUNG HONG, D.C., L.AC. and others
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant:
CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. NJ INSTITUTE FOR SPINE AND JOINT PAIN, PC et al
as 2:2022cv02481
Defendant:
HEALTH MEDICAL REHABILITATION CENTER, L.L.C., NJ INSTITUTE FOR SPINE AND JOINT PAIN, PC, JORGE MENDEZ, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. MOUNT PROSPECT CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. et al
as 2:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
MOUNT PROSPECT CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. doing business as MOUNT PROSPECT HEALTH CENTER, TERRY MCSWEENEY, D.C., HASSAN MEDICAL PAIN RELIEF AND WELLNESS CENTER LLC doing business as HASSAN SPINE AND SPORTS MEDICINE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. BERGER, D.C. et al
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
PETER BERGER, D.C., HAWTHORNE PAIN & SPINE CENTER, LLC, JON-PAUL DADAIAN, M.D., and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Ronald Panella, M.D. et al
as 8:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Ronald Panella, Best Care Medical Group, Inc., Jorge Consuegra and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
