Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hammer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant:
3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Hammer, James Barnes, J Kim Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21601
Plaintiff:
WALLACE GENE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08981
Plaintiff:
GENE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tubman v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Vernon E. Tubman
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Gene Johnson and FNU Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Jackson v. Gene Johnson, et al
as 14-12208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, KELLY A. LEE, E. CLAYTON SCOFIELD, III, Judge and others
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv02589
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Kelly A. Lee, E. Clayton Scofield, III and others
HAMMOCK v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
BILLY N HAMMOCK
Defendant:
JOHNSON, SAMUEL OLENS, RICHARD A MALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bussard v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Robert Bussard
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Gene Johnson, Michael Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Hammock
Defendant:
Jackie Williams, Joyce Griener, Ann M. Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Bishop et al
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Hammock
Defendant:
FNU Bishop, Fox Clan, Jackie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
